Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Transformers
Sicko
Ratatouille
Disturbia
Paris - Sonic Jihad
David Bazan - Fewer Moving Parts
Todd Steed and the Suns of Phere - Heartbreak and Duct Tape
Starflyer 59 - Leave Here a Stranger
Mustard - Eureka Grande
My Photo
Name:
Location: Illinois, United States

The peaches, apples, plums and pears are guarded by ferocious bears.

Powered by Blogger


Resumes
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone - J.K. Rowling
My Secret - Frank Warren
Persepolis - Marjane Satrapi

12 February 2005

Revisiting "The Passion of the Christ"

Not long after Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ came out, I was talking on the phone with a woman who is a friend of my wife’s family. She asked if my wife and I had seen the film. I told her that we had. She then talked for a bit about how much she enjoyed Gibson’s movie. Most of her appreciation was couched in the idea that Passion is a beautiful and moving portrayal of Christ’s love for the world. I’m paraphrasing a bit, but, touching on the film’s intense violence, she basically said, “He did all that for me.”

I have mixed feelings about Gibson’s film. From an artistic standpoint, it’s well done. Gibson is a competent director who knows how to tell a story cinematically. Of the movies I’ve seen about the life of Jesus, Passion is the best (unless you consider Monty Python’s Life of Brian and the wonderful Jesus of Montreal to be “about the life of Jesus,” in which case it’s a tossup. Perhaps most interesting to me, though, is how Passion points to the hypocrisy of the church in this country.

The church’s attitude towards cinema, in particular, and the arts, in general, is changing a bit. Some Christians try to create beautiful art, in the belief that art reflects God’s creativity. Others view art as a new language with which to communicate the gospel. Then there are those who try to do both.

But many Christians still view cinema with suspicion. I’m generalizing here, of course, but many Christians are afraid of the movies. The church I grew up in, for instance, was filled with parents who wouldn’t allow their children to watch R-rated films. And I’m talking high school students here, not fourth graders. Our pastor, who never denounced racism from the pulpit or preached a sermon about feeding the poor, would make us change the channel on youth group outings whenever a swear word popped up on television (boxing, however, was OK). This brand of film viewer considers a film “good” if it doesn’t contain violence, sex, drug use, swearing or hostility towards Christianity. A film is “bad” if it does contain these things. The context of this violence, sex, drug use, swearing or hostility towards Christianity is irrelevant.

Of course, the Bible is chock full of these things (except maybe the drug use). The Bible contains gang rapes, brutal executions, murder plots, incest, seduction, sex slavery, forced foreskin removal, genocide, prophets who marry prostitutes and who walk about naked, violent poetic imagery rivaling anything you’ve ever heard in a gangster rap song, and even a lengthy erotic poem. The King James version has quasi-swear words (whore, prick, piss). Some scholars will tell you that the original biblical text features words that could be translated as “shit” and “fuck.” As Franky Schaeffer once noted, if the Bible were made into a movie, as it’s written, it would be rated R. Parts would be rated NC-17.

Gibson’s movie proves this. And Christians flocked to it in droves.

Of course, there are dozens of R-rated films that deserve to be seen. Films that are filled with truth, hope, grace, love and redemption. Films that are important and that need to be seen. Films that are violent and sexual without being gratuitous. Films that are violent and sexual because real life is violent and sexual.

The Thin Red Line. Donnie Darko. Pulp Fiction. A Clockwork Orange. Sling Blade. Magnolia. Requiem for a Dream. Rushmore. Se7en. Fight Club. The Ice Storm. Terminator 2. Saving Private Ryan. Saved! The Rapture. Punch Drunk Love. Things You Can Tell Just By Looking At Her. Good Will Hunting. Bowling for Columbine. Fargo. Chasing Amy. These are films Christians should be watching. But some Christians won’t. For them, these films are either too explicit or too dangerous. For some reason, though, the Bible they read is not.

Comments on "Revisiting "The Passion of the Christ""

 

Blogger Dan said ... (2/12/2005 01:36:00 AM) : 

You're a good writer. Interesting post, especially the movies list. Didn't see The Passion myself so cannot comment on it. From what I've seen in life the people running the church's mostly mean well but being people, they still miss the mark and alienate some folks along the way. A few wrong words and man, you've got someone who may never go to worship again. I wa raised Roman Cath as a child but when I got older and found out about the incredible wealth the Vatican sits on, man, that made me sick. Catholics and all people should try to expose themselves to a wide variety of music, reading, art works, etcetera. Since we are given free will we are free to create and share hese creations, these little efforts. And by exposing ourselves to a lot of things we become well-rounded people. Hopefully as time passes the walls that have been built separating different faiths will come down and people will come together and live in peace. I hope! Life on earth is just too uch fun to let some madman with a bomb ruin it for everyone. You take care now. Dan

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (2/12/2005 03:05:00 PM) : 

Pulp Fiction is not gratuitous violence? I think you are just upset that conservatives went to the movies. You don't want them there anyway, because if Hollywood dumbed their stuff down enough to cater to fundmentalist idiots then you would be bored. Be grateful that you are enlightened enough to enjoy your non gratuitous sex and violence which makes you a better Christian. Way better than some idiot who thinks Christ might have died for her.... the audacity of the fool.

 

Blogger Wasp Jerky said ... (2/12/2005 03:34:00 PM) : 

Hi Anonymous. No, I don't think that Pulp Fiction is gratuitous violence. Perhaps on the surface. But, as Christianity Today film critic Jeffrey Overstreet noted in his review of PF, there's more going on here. If you watch closely, you'll see that each of the major characters in the film is brought to a crossroads. They each come upon a moral decision, where they can choose to continue towards selfishness and chaos, or else take steps towards grace and virtue. Some of the characters make the right choice. Some of them don't.

Incidentally, I never called anyone an idiot. And I've never thought of myself as a good Christian. I'm quite a shithead actually.

At any rate, thanks for stopping by Anon. You too, Dan.

 

post a comment